A few of these friends of mine who approach anarchism from a egalitarian perspective (which I believe is wrong) are actually speaking out in support of the rioters. This debate I've been having with them clearly reflects the one over the French Revolution which broke apart the British Whigs in the 18th Century. The Old Whigs, led by the The Right Honourable Edmund Burke based their opposition to the revolution on Burke's great work: Reflections on the Revolution in France. The reason I feel like Burke is that I have been using arguments similar to Burke's in my opposition to the riots. That is, I support traditional order, Rule of Law, and anti-egalitarianism. Both the means and the ends of the rioters are, in my opinion, evil and wrong.
Meanwhile, the New Whigs, led by The Honourable Charles James Fox, supported the French Revolution on principle (anti-royalism and egalitarianism). In fact many of them, such as Fox himself, supported the revolution even after it degenerated into the famous Reign of Terror under Robespierre. Many Rothbardian anarchists of the 'left' variety have been using rhetoric similar to Fox's when arguing their case with me in their pro-Riot view.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d627b/d627b51d7e8c7b4acb25f2f19b665706402342c5" alt=""
Another thing I notice here is that the pro-Riot opinion seems to be highly reminiscient of 'Propaganda by the Deed' talk. Personally I am more in favour of education and peaceful resistance than violence, as I think I have discussed often enough on this blog. As the great Edmund Burke wrote in those Reflections: "Our patience will achieve more than our force".
No comments:
Post a Comment